Rene Descartes is the infamous author of several world renowned philosophies. Amongst his work is his tiresome effort to work on the mind and the body. He drew a unique connection between the two and mind-body dualism. He argues that the mind is completely different than the physical body of a human being. He questions how the mind can control the ways in which one’s body behaves and functions. Following is a brief discussion of how Descartes thinks the mind is in unison with the body and vice versa. He comes up with his own distinct theory to comprehend the major and minor differences between the real and otherwise made distinction between the human mind and the physical body.
Descartes theory can readily be divided into two parts. Before he begins, he takes it on board to discuss the reality of the fact whether the mind and the body are even in contact and what kinds of role they play in one another’s responsive nature. The second part of his theory is when he claims that the question itself curtails from the fabricated conjecture that two materials with completely dissimilar faunas cannot act on each other.
The principal presupposition concerns a clarification of how the mind and the body are united. Descartes' comments about this problem are scattered crosswise over both his distributed works and his private communications. These content's show that Descartes did not keep up that willful substantial developments and sensation emerge on account of the causal communication of brain and body by contact and movement. Maybe, he keeps up an adaptation of the structure matter hypothesis of soul-body union embraced by some of his academic Aristotelian ancestors and peers. Despite the fact that a nearby examination of the writings being referred to can't be directed here, a brief outline of how this hypothesis functions for Descartes can be given.
Hence it can be concluded that Descartes’ theory does not evade all the fundamental problems supplementary with uniting inconsequential souls or mind to their respective bodies.
However, if is true, it helps to cast Descartes’ thoughts in a new light and to redirect the attention of scholars to the causal problems involved.